Miranda is decisive, direct, and brutally clear about what excellence looks like. She doesn’t sugarcoat feedback, and she doesn’t slow down to coddle people—but she’s consistent. The standards are high, visible, and unwavering. You always know when you’ve met them and when you haven’t.
Emily, on the other hand, sets Andy up to fail. She provides almost no onboarding, explains nothing about expectations, and then treats every mistake as a personal failing. Andy isn’t bad at the job—she’s uninformed. Emily withholds context, assumes knowledge, and replaces guidance with sarcasm. That’s not toughness; that’s poor leadership.
Over the course of your career, you’ll work for all kinds of bosses. The decisive, demanding ones may feel intimidating or even rude at times, but they’re rarely the real problem. You can adapt to clarity. You can grow under clear standards.
What’s far more damaging is vagueness. Leaders who don’t explain success, don’t define priorities, and don’t invest in onboarding create chaos—and then punish people for it. Ambiguity masquerading as “figure it out” isn’t empowerment. It’s negligence.
Miranda tells you exactly what she wants. Emily expects you to read her mind. One creates pressure. The other creates failure.
Leave a Reply